List Event Creators

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations provided, so the description must communicate safety and behavior. It only mentions pagination and neither confirms read-only semantics nor explains return format, ordering, authentication requirements, or rate limits. The verb 'list' implies read-only, but other behavioral traits are not disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence and is easy to parse. It does not waste words, though the brevity approaches under-specification rather than well-balanced conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description does not communicate what the response contains (e.g., event creator IDs, names, total count), nor does it mention any details about ordering or defaults. The absence of behavioral and return information makes it incomplete for an agent to invoke confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no descriptions for limit and offset (0% coverage). The description's mention of pagination gives a high-level hint that limit and offset control pagination, but it does not explain their meaning, defaults, or constraints beyond what the schema already provides in type/min/max.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists event creators and mentions pagination. It uses the specific verb 'list' and resource 'event creators', but it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool get_event_creator, so it is clear but not fully distinguishing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool over alternatives such as get_event_creator or list_events. The description only states what it does, not in which situation it should be chosen.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.