Ver el pedido de certificado (CSR)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description adds that the CSR 'Es público' (is public), reinforcing that no sensitive data is involved. It also clues the agent into the expected payload shape (texto, ruta del archivo y alias) without contradicting the read-only annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and each clause carries distinct information: output components, environment-specific usage, and publicness. The colon-and-semicolon structure is slightly awkward but no content is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-enum, read-only tool with no output schema, the description supplies the necessary scope, environment variants, and a hint at the return fields. It does not explicitly state 'returns', but the title and parenthetical make the behavior clear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate for the undocumented 'entorno' parameter. It does so by mapping the two values to 'homologación' and 'producción', so an agent can infer that 'homo' and 'prod' select the environment.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title 'Ver el pedido de certificado (CSR)' names the action (view) and the resource (certificate request/CSR), and the description narrows the scope to 'un entorno' with homologación/producción variants. It is clear that this is a retrieval tool for CSR data, though the description itself is a noun phrase and does not state the verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives downstream context: the homologación CSR is pasted into WSASS and the producción CSR is uploaded as a file in Digital Certificates Administration. It does not explicitly say when to choose this tool over siblings or when not to use it, so the usage guidance is implied rather than stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.