Skip to main content
Glama
ifte66
by ifte66

Related Servers

Alternatives to sanad-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server to search and retrieve passages from a corpus of 7,872 classical Islamic books via the Sahifah API, with full citations and mu'tabar filtering.
      22 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to Quran data — reciters, surahs, full-text search, ayah retrieval, prayer times, live radio stations, and Hijri dates — so AI agents can answer Islamic content queries. Runs locally via stdio or remotely over stateless HTTP for Claude, ChatGPT, and other MCP clients.
      8
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI clients with fast, hallucination-free access to the Quran through 13 MCP tools, covering search, navigation, morphology, tafsir, translations, and surah background over stdio and Streamable HTTP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Remote MCP server exposing Wasilah's Islamic reference data, enabling prayer-time, Qibla, Hijri-date, and Quran-audio queries via natural language.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: answer_question is the user-facing policy-gated path, search_corpus is retrieval-only, get_passage fetches by ID, check_policy isolates the gate, corpus_inventory reports coverage, and list_gaps records misses. The descriptions explicitly prevent confusion between answer_question and search_corpus.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Five tools follow verb_noun (answer_question, search_corpus, get_passage, check_policy, list_gaps), but corpus_inventory breaks the pattern as a noun_noun phrase. This is a minor deviation, not enough to confuse an agent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the ideal range and each has a distinct purpose in the policy-gated retrieval workflow. No tool appears redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core query lifecycle: asking, searching, retrieving, policy checking, inventory, and gap tracking. Missing operations for adding corpus content or resolving gaps are minor for a read-oriented server but leave the improvement loop partially manual.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues