Skip to main content
Glama
ifokeev

Airbrowser

by ifokeev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Airbrowser

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Ghost Browser MCP

      BU3NO77XL
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Undetectable browser automation server for MCP-compatible AI agents, offering 225 tools across 32 sections to navigate, extract, clone pages, and bypass antibot systems like Cloudflare.
      1
      -

    • agent-stealth-browser

      Edwardsaga
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A stealth-enhanced browser automation MCP server for AI agents to interact with websites while bypassing anti-bot detection mechanisms like Cloudflare and reCAPTCHA.
      9
      MIT

    • cloakbrowser-mcp

      ColorSource
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Stealth browser automation for AI agents, using source-patched Chromium to bypass bot detection systems like Cloudflare, reCAPTCHA, and FingerprintJS.
      28
      Apache 2.0

    • Stealth Browser MCP

      burgebj
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Undetectable browser automation for AI agents that bypasses Cloudflare, antibot systems, and social media blocks using real browser instances with 97 tools across 11 sections.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct purpose—navigation, interaction, reading, state checking, storage, tabs, window, etc. Even the three condition tools (check_if_condition, wait_for_condition, assert_condition) have clear behavioral differences reinforced by the 'Tool selection' guidance.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (start_browser, click_element, get_content, manage_tabs, etc.). No camelCase, no vague verbs, and the manage_* group is uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 24 tools, the server sits in the 16–25 range, which feels heavy. Each tool is individually justified for a browser automation suite, but the count borders on overwhelming and could potentially be consolidated (e.g., merging some read/condition tools).

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full browser automation lifecycle: session handling, navigation, element interaction, content reading, state synchronization, cookies, storage, tabs, window management, scrolling, capturing, and arbitrary JS execution. No obvious dead ends or missing core operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources