woffu_day_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states 'including all clock events' but does not disclose behavior such as what happens if the day has no clock events, whether errors occur for invalid dates, or any side effects. Being a read operation, mutability is not an issue, but absence of error/edge-case handling reduces transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with 12 words, front-loading the core purpose. Every word is necessary; no fluff or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description gives a general idea of return content ('detailed info...including all clock events') but lacks specifics on the data structure or additional fields. For a simple single-parameter tool, this is adequate but not fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: the single parameter 'date' has a clear description and default value. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'detailed info for a specific day', and specifies inclusion of 'all clock events', which distinguishes it from siblings like woffu_month_summary or woffu_week_summary that cover broader time periods.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for a specific day, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., woffu_month_summary for month view, woffu_clock_in for individual events). No when-not-to-use or conditions provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.