reading_import_finish

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provide behavioral hints, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the tool performs a write operation (adds to library) but fails to mention side effects, error states, or idempotency. Minimal transparency beyond the basic function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler words, directly stating the action and outcome. It is front-loaded with the verb 'Finish'. However, it is arguably too concise, sacrificing clarity for brevity, which prevents a higher score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks prerequisites or state requirements for the import, such as needing a prior reading_import_begin call. There is no output schema, and the return value is not described. For a tool in a multi-step process, this falls short of completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the schema provides no parameter descriptions. The tool description does not explain 'uploadId' including its origin, format, or how to obtain it. The agent is left guessing what value to provide, which is insufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Finish', the resource 'a chunked import', and the outcome 'add the uploaded EPUB/TXT to the reading library'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like reading_import_begin and reading_import_part by specifying it is the final step.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage after starting a chunked import but does not explicitly state when to use or not to use this tool. No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned, though the sibling list provides some context. The guidance is implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.