Skip to main content
Glama
idea404

email-mcp-plus

by idea404
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to email-mcp-plus

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • outlook-mcp

      Plong-Wasin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for sending and managing Microsoft Outlook email via the Microsoft Graph API, including drafts, replies, contacts, and directory search.
      170 npm
      MIT

    • outlook-mcp

      DerechoVirtual
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing full control over Outlook.com, Hotmail, Live, or Microsoft 365 email via Microsoft Graph API, enabling reading, searching, sending, and managing messages and folders securely.
      1
      MIT

    • mcp-email-client

      rifkyfadillah404
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for email management that enables reading, searching, drafting, replying to, and sending emails with thread-aware replies and draft-first safety, supporting Gmail API and IMAP/SMTP backends.
      8 npm
      -

    • email-mcp

      contributory
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for reading, searching, sending, and managing emails via IMAP/SMTP, with tools like list_emails, read_email, search_emails, send_email, get_attachment, get_account_info, and mark_email_read.
      30 npm
      ISC
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct, but search_emails and get_sent_items both perform searches with overlapping capabilities (subject/date queries). The descriptions clarify that get_sent_items is specific to the sent folder, but an agent could still confuse which to use. Other tools have clearly separate roles.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names generally follow a verb_noun pattern (search_emails, list_folders, get_email_body, list_attachments, get_attachment). However, get_sent_items is a search operation but uses 'get' instead of 'search', deviating from the pattern established by search_emails. Overall, naming is readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for email search and retrieval. Each tool covers a needed function without unnecessary overlap or bloat, making the count appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers searching, folder listing, body retrieval, and attachment handling, which is solid for a read-oriented email tool. Missing operations like sending or moving emails are not necessarily required for the apparent scope. A minor gap is the lack of a direct 'list emails in a folder' tool, but search can work around it.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources