Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to tbank-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes Moolre's API as 24 tools for AI agents, enabling account management, transfers, payments, SMS, and WhatsApp operations.
      24
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Enable Banking API tools for interacting with bank accounts through Open Banking. It enables users to authenticate sessions, list accounts, and fetch transaction history or balances via a secure self-hosted server.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Unofficial MCP server for SberBank Online, enabling agents to read banking products and operations and perform transfers between own accounts directly via HTTP, with human confirmation for transfers. Also provides an async SDK and CLI for use without an agent.
      12 PyPI
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with NexBank API v2, providing six business tools and supporting Bearer Token or OAuth authentication.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive banking system with MCP server capabilities and REST API, enabling account management, deposits, withdrawals, transfers, and transaction history through natural language or HTTP endpoints.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for T-Kassa (T-Bank/Tinkoff) payment API. Provides 16 tools for payments, refunds, recurring charges, customer management, saved cards, SBP, receipts, and T-Invest portfolio.
      51 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 90 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set uses clear domain prefixes and the descriptions often cross-reference related tools, but there are still several confusing families: list_operations vs card_operations vs operations_histogram, bank_documents vs documents, confirm_otp/confirm_pin/confirm_password/confirm_payment, and the generic get_data singleton. An agent would need to read very long descriptions carefully to avoid selecting the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of names are snake_case with a predictable domain prefix and a descriptive action or noun, such as grocery_search, train_book, list_accounts, transfer_sbp_resolve, and card_limits. Minor deviations like bare nouns for read-style actions (orders, trips, documents, diagnostics), plus a few noun-led names, stop it from being fully consistent but do not make the naming chaotic.

    Tool Count1/5

    90 tools is extreme for any single MCP server, even for a broad banking super-app. This many tools turns tool selection into a search problem rather than a decision among few clear options, and agents are more likely to overload context or miss the right tool.

    Completeness3/5

    Many major flows are covered end-to-end: payments, transfers, grocery ordering, train booking/payment/refund, cinema booking/payment/cancellation, and messenger conversation are implemented in detail. However, several obvious dead ends remain for a bank app: hotel booking and marketplace checkout are intentionally not supported, flight_book is effectively non-working/experimental, and inner transfer between own accounts is missing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues