Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to CodeHealth MCP

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Analyzes repositories, explains architecture, calculates change impact, and enforces guardrails for AI Agents like Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex via MCP tools.
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Code dependency graph and AI context engine. 10 MCP tools that give Claude, Cursor, and any MCP client full codebase context — impact analysis, dependency tracing, architecture summaries, and interactive arc diagram visualization. Supports TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, and Go.
    24
    2,000 npm
    64
    Business Source 1.1
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides AI-powered architecture analysis and visualization of codebases, exposing 17 MCP tools for querying components, dependencies, and generating interactive diagrams.
    23 npm
    5
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    AI code analysis tools that plug into Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, and any MCP client, providing six specialized tools for explaining code, debugging, code review, security audit, automation script generation, and MCP blueprint design.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Whole-repo code graph for AI agents: impact analysis, dead code, cycles, semantic code search — 14 tools via hosted MCP endpoint.
    15
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to run deterministic, zero-dependency AST static analysis over source code, building call graphs and dependency metrics to find orphaned functions, unreachable methods, breaking API surface diffs, and token-bloat clusters, then return a structured refactoring plan. It plugs into MCP clients like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Windsurf via a single Python entrypoint.
    7
    -

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct analysis concern: dead code, circular deps, coupling, architectural drift, combined scan, and explanation. No overlap in purpose; even full_health_scan is clearly a superset rather than a duplicative tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

Naming follows a strong verb_noun pattern but mixes 'analyze' and 'detect' as starting verbs, plus 'full_health_scan' and 'explain_finding' break the strict pattern slightly. Still, all names are descriptive and predictable.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools are well-scoped for a code health analysis server. Each tool covers a meaningful aspect, and the full scan consolidates several, avoiding redundancy.

Completeness4/5

The server covers the core analysis surface (dead code, circular deps, coupling, architecture) plus explanation and a comprehensive scan. Minor gaps like generating reports or managing ignore lists are not essential for the apparent scope.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues