delete_record
Delete one or multiple records from a specified worksheet by providing the worksheet ID and record IDs.
Instructions
删除指定记录
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| worksheetId | Yes | 工作表ID或别名 | |
| rowId | Yes | 记录ID,多个用逗号分隔 |
Delete one or multiple records from a specified worksheet by providing the worksheet ID and record IDs.
删除指定记录
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| worksheetId | Yes | 工作表ID或别名 | |
| rowId | Yes | 记录ID,多个用逗号分隔 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden, but it only states the action without disclosing traits like irreversibility, permissions needed, or effects on related data.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, concise and front-loaded. However, it could be slightly expanded for completeness without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete for a delete operation. It should mention permanence, support for multiple record deletion, and lack of undo.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so schema already documents parameters. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema, meeting baseline but not improving it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete specified record' clearly states the action and resource. It differentiates from sibling read/create/update tools, but lacks detail on the specific type of record.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives, no prerequisites or caveats mentioned. The description does not help the agent decide context of use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iceleaf916/mingdao-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server