scene_edit_detection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations and the description provides no behavioral details—no mention of side effects, permissions, return values, or any operational characteristics. The agent is left completely uninformed about what the tool does or expects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, which might be seen as concise, but it is under-specified rather than efficiently minimalist. It lacks structured information and front-loads no actionable content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complete lack of annotations, output schema, or meaningful parameter details, the description is woefully incomplete. It fails to explain the tool's purpose, usage, or expected behavior, making it essentially unhelpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero defined parameters and the description adds no meaning about potential implicit inputs (though the schema allows additionalProperties). With no annotation and no description of what the tool requires, the agent cannot infer how to provide inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Premiere Pro expanded operation: scene edit detection' merely rephrases the tool name without stating what the tool does. It lacks a specific verb or resource, and 'expanded operation' is vague and does not distinguish it from siblings like 'detect_scene_edits'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or exclusions, leaving the agent without any direction on invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.