No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 13 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource/action pair, and the da_/nb_ prefixes cleanly separate the two archive services. Close pairs like da_get_record vs nb_get_page and da_download_page vs nb_download_page are explicitly differentiated, and nb_search vs nb_search_inside is clarified in the descriptions. place_names vs municipalities are also distinct (gazetteer vs historical administrative codes).
The dominant pattern is consistent service-prefixed verb_noun snake_case (da_search_persons, da_get_source, nb_download_page), which is predictable and readable. Minor deviations are the noun-only place_names and municipalities and the meta-tool cache_status, but these are few and still clear.
At 13 tools the set is well-scoped: roughly four tools per archive service plus two geographic lookups and one session utility. Every tool has a clear role in the research workflow, and nothing feels padded or redundant.
The surface covers a full pipeline from discovery (search persons/sources/items) through inspection (get record/source, list pages, search inside) to evidence (download page, get page, citation data), plus place and municipality lookups. Gaps are minor: there is no unified cross-service search, no tool for browsing holdings beyond place/period queries, and no explicit citation-export operation, but agents can work around these.