wp_taxonomies_get_category
Retrieve a single WordPress category by its ID, returning its details.
Instructions
Fetch a single category by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Retrieve a single WordPress category by its ID, returning its details.
Fetch a single category by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits itself. It only states 'Fetch', implying a read-only operation, but does not describe return format, error behavior (e.g., 404 if not found), or any other side effects. This is insufficient for an unannotated tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is one sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource, containing no filler words. It is concise and easy to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has no output schema and no annotations, so the description should clarify return value and error handling. It does not, leaving the agent uncertain about what to expect from the response. The low complexity does not excuse the lack of return information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 0% description coverage, so the description must compensate. 'by id' simply restates the parameter name 'id' without adding semantic detail such as what the ID represents (e.g., WordPress term ID) or how to obtain it. The exclusiveMinimum is already present in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses the specific verb 'Fetch' with resource 'category', and specifies 'by id', distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_categories, create_category, update_category, and delete_category. It clearly states what the tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, situations where this should be preferred, or reference sibling tools such as list_categories for multiple categories.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iamsamuelfraga/mcp-wordpress'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server