resolve_test_result

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states that payload must include status, but does not mention if the operation is reversible, what permissions are needed, or any side effects. This is insufficient for understanding the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is concise and directly states the core requirement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a mutation with no output schema and only basic parameter descriptions, the description should provide more context about expected behavior, allowed status values, and idempotency. It currently lacks completeness for an agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 50% of parameters (only 'id' has description). The description adds that 'payload must include status', which compensates for the missing parameter description for 'payload'. However, it does not specify other possible properties or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('resolve') and resource ('test result'), and differentiates from siblings like 'create_test_result' or 'update_test_result' by using the specific verb 'resolve', which implies a status update. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from 'assign_test_result' or other result-related tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'assign_test_result' or 'update_test_result'. It does not specify prerequisites, context, or conditions that trigger its use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.