Skip to main content
Glama
iamgeorgekelly

commerce-evidence-toolkit

Related Servers

Alternatives to commerce-evidence-toolkit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only inspection of ad-bid recommendations, scenario analysis, and explanation of threshold decisions using synthetic fixtures, without requiring live ad accounts or credentials.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to inspect project snapshots, detect attribution gaps, generate consent-aware integrations, simulate journeys, verify lifecycle boundaries, calculate coverage, and reconcile conversion records.
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local auditing of trading strategies through MCP checkers for point-in-time data provenance, pre-trade order validation, and regime-fragility testing, while deferring promotion verdicts to a hosted service.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to query Google Analytics 4 reporting and configuration data through 27 read-only tools, including pivots, funnels, realtime reports, Admin API inspection, and diagnostics, with identifiers redacted by default.
      27
      219 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching fictional policy documents and assessing expense claims against deterministic rules via MCP, returning structured assessments and citations without an approval tool.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct evidence operation: single-record review, dimensional comparison, and feed snapshot comparison. Any apparent overlap around USD prices is resolved by the object of comparison (one record vs. source/feed snapshots).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern: review_*, compare_*. The repeated compare_ prefix is justified because the objects differ, and there are no mixed conventions or vague action names.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is a tight but appropriate scope for a specialized evidence-validation toolkit. Each tool handles a distinct evidence type and earns its place, with no redundant or filler tools present.

    Completeness4/5

    Core evidence workflows are covered: canonical product-record review, dimensional comparison, and feed snapshot comparison. However, the toolkit explicitly omits external evidence operations such as URL fetching, GTIN verification, and provider upload validation, which would be minor gaps for some commerce evidence tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues