Skip to main content
Glama
iamfiro

Parcel Tracking MCP Server

by iamfiro
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to Parcel Tracking MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Parcel MCP Server

      NOVA-3951
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to track and manage deliveries by interacting with the Parcel delivery tracking API. Users can add new shipments, retrieve active delivery statuses, and look up carrier information through natural language.
      2
      -

    • Parcel MCP Server

      oliverames
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables delivery tracking through the Parcel API, including listing and fetching deliveries, searching carriers, and adding new deliveries with optional write protection and multiple credential methods.
      5
      16 npm
      MIT

    • 24htrack-mcp

      ngkienmkqn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Track packages across 3,200+ carriers (USPS, UPS, FedEx, DHL, China Post, UniUni, SpeedX and more) with automatic carrier detection. Register, list, and archive tracking numbers and get real-time delivery event timelines via the 24hTrack API.
      39 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one searches for carriers by name, while the other tracks parcel deliveries. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (search-carrier and tracking-delivery), using hyphens for separation. The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a parcel tracking domain. A typical tracking system would include more operations, such as creating shipments, updating statuses, or handling multiple carriers, making this count insufficient for comprehensive coverage.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset is severely incomplete for parcel tracking. It lacks essential CRUD operations like creating or updating shipments, retrieving carrier details beyond search, and managing delivery events. This will likely cause agent failures in common tracking workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources