get_storage_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

无注释提供，描述承担了行为披露的负担。描述了返回内容和格式（JSON状态信息），但未明确说明操作是否只读、是否会触发副作用或需要权限。不过“查看”和“获取”暗示了非破坏性，基本行为是清晰的。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述简洁高效，第一句即点明核心功能，随后补充返回内容，每句话都有价值，没有冗余信息。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

工具无参数、有输出模式，描述已涵盖返回格式和主要内容。对于这种简单查询工具，没有遗漏关键信息，描述足以让代理正确调用。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

该工具没有参数，输入模式为空，因此描述无需补充参数语义。根据规则，0参数时基线得分为4。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述明确使用了具体动词“获取/查看”，资源是“存储配置和状态”，并具体说明包含本地/远程存储状态和拉取配置。与兄弟工具如get_rss_feeds_status、get_system_status在名称和描述上都能清晰区分。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述隐含了用途（查看存储状态），但没有明确说明何时使用此工具而非其他工具，也没有提及替代方案或排除条件。虽然功能自明，但缺少显式的使用情境指导。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.