Skip to main content
Glama
i-ops-hq

assurance-mcp

by i-ops-hq
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to assurance-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • disk-cleanup

      tjws
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only local disk cleanup scanning via MCP, allowing clients to find large files, duplicates, junk extensions, and old files, and generate cleanup lists without deleting or modifying anything.
      5
      MIT

    • flameox

      morluto
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to query, compare, and audit local profiler traces, benchmarks, memory captures, and execution evidence without uploading code or data, using CLI and MCP interfaces.
      111
      115 PyPI
      114
      MIT

    • alpha-mcp

      rsc-dev
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables investing workflows through read-only lookups in a local replica of Global.db, including table queries, fund data review and updates, document storage, and provider review prompts.
      10
      -

    • file-analysis-mcp

      KyuSeon80
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local folder analysis of unstructured documents (PDF, DOCX, PPTX, TXT, SVG, PNG, CSV, XLSX) by extracting structure, reading content, and generating reports, with a strict approval gate before any save operation.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools mostly partition cleanly: staleness checking, dated-file listing, folder-month coverage, and arbitrary set coverage are distinct jobs. The two coverage tools have similar names and check_coverage_tool/list_dated_files_tool both read dated filenames, but the descriptions clarify when each is appropriate.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same verb_noun_tool convention with lowercase snake_case and a consistent trailing _tool suffix. There is no mixing of camelCase, vauge verbs, or haphazard pattens.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well within the well-scoped range and each tool earns its place as a distinct read-only assurance operation. The set feels compact without being thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the main assurance workflows: listing available dated periods, checking month-level folder coverage, checking arbitrary set coverage, and checking staleness against a named source. A minor gap is that there is no discovery tool for finding plausible source files for staleness checks, but the descriptions make clear that the caller is expected to supply both paths.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources