Skip to main content
Glama
hyunjongmoon

mcp-mssql-server

by hyunjongmoon

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-mssql-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A read-only-by-default Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Microsoft SQL Server with schema discovery, SELECT-only queries, execution-plan analysis, and opt-in writes per profile. Profile-based configuration serves multiple databases and servers from one toolset deployment.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only SQL Server MCP server enabling safe database queries, table listing, and schema inspection with built-in security protections.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for browsing and querying SQL Server databases, providing tools to list schemas, tables, describe columns, and execute safe SELECT queries with validated parameters.
      15
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for Microsoft SQL Server that enables AI agents to safely explore and query SQL Server databases.
      571 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for exploring on-premises, multi-instance Microsoft SQL Server estates from AI clients, with read-only enforcement and Windows authentication support.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for secure read-only PostgreSQL queries with automatic PII masking, pseudonymization, and strict SQL guards to enforce data privacy compliance.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves column metadata for tables/views, the other retrieves stored procedure definitions. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent `get_<object>_metadata` pattern with snake_case and descriptive verbs (get). The naming is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools for a server named 'mssql-server', the surface is extremely thin. A typical database server would need many more tools (e.g., query, list objects, DDL operations) to be useful. The count is far too low for the implied scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set covers only metadata retrieval for tables and stored procedures. Missing are fundamental operations like executing queries, listing all objects, or modifying schema. Agents will face dead ends when trying to interact with the database beyond these two narrow tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues