write_post

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'requires authentication' but does not describe side effects, whether the post is published immediately, what the response looks like, or any irreversibility. This is a significant transparency gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no fluff. It front-loads the core purpose ('Create a new post on Velog') and immediately follows with the key prerequisite, making it highly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (7 parameters) and the absence of an output schema and annotations, the description is too sparse. It does not explain return values, post-creation behavior, or any constraints beyond authentication. The schema covers parameter details, but the overall context of what happens when the tool is invoked remains incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptive text for each field, so the baseline is 3 per the rubric. The description itself adds no additional parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides, such as relationships or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Create' with the resource 'a new post on Velog', making the action unmistakable. It clearly distinguishes this tool from siblings like edit_post and delete_post, which modify or remove posts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating new posts through the verb 'Create', and the authentication requirement is a helpful prerequisite. However, it does not explicitly identify alternatives such as edit_post for modifications or state when not to use this tool, leaving the guidance implicit rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.