A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that streams K-line (candlestick) data from decentralized exchanges (DEXs) to power your AI agents and workflows.
1
4
MIT
perp-cli
by hypurrquant
Related Servers
Alternatives to perp-cli
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to trade leveraged perpetual futures on Solana's Jupiter Perpetuals while providing tools for market data and technical analysis. It supports portfolio management, fee estimation, and automated position execution for SOL, ETH, and BTC using USDC collateral.132-
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Hyperliquid perpetual DEX with 48 tools for trading, monitoring, risk management, and security. Enables real-time market data, order management, risk validation, and automated trading strategies.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMonetized MCP server for Hyperliquid whale/funding/risk analytics + signals;171MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides real-time data and insights from the Hyperliquid perp DEX for use in bots, dashboards, and analytics.1729MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAI-to-AI marketplace MCP server with 46 tools — swap 65+ crypto tokens on 7 chains, rent GPUs, trade 25 tokenized stocks, on-chain escrow (Solana + Base), DeFi yields, sentiment analysis, wallet monitoring, and image generation. Supports USDC payments across 14 blockchains.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server combining DEX Screener market data with Jupiter swap quotes and gated execution on Solana, offering read-only tools and an optional trading mode with safety caps.113 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceCross-chain DeFi intelligence MCP server for AI agents. 7 tools for yield discovery, pool analysis, profit simulation, risk scoring, whale tracking, impermanent loss calculation, and DeFi overview across 86 chains and 6,500+ liquidity pools.71AGPL 3.0
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 18 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct operation or data type: scanning, comparison, analysis, trading steps, health check, etc. Even related tools like arb_scan and get_arb_compare have clearly separated purposes (opportunities vs active positions), and get_balance vs portfolio differ by scope (single exchange vs cross-exchange summary). No harmful overlap.
Naming Consistency3/5
The naming mixes conventions: most retrieval tools use the verb get_ (e.g., get_balance, get_markets), but some use noun-first patterns (arb_scan, health_check, portfolio) or verb-noun with trade_ prefix (trade_close, trade_execute, trade_preview). While readable, the inconsistency can cause an agent to mispredict tool names.
Tool Count5/5
18 tools cover a broad but focused domain: cross-exchange trading, arbitrage, portfolio management, and health checks. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is well-scoped—neither sparse nor overwhelming for the intended functionality.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the full trading lifecycle (preview, execute, close) and provides rich analysis (funding, P&L, arbitrage) and monitoring (health, portfolio). A notable gap is the absence of a cancel_order tool, which could break workflows when the user needs to cancel an open order. Otherwise, it is comprehensive.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive