Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to self-starter

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      One local memory every coding agent on your machine shares — Claude Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop, OpenCode. Answers from past sessions, commits, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md and ADRs with the exact source, and withholds work another agent has claimed so two agents don't rewrite the same thing.
      3
      4,617 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      The watchdog for unattended AI agents: flags MISSED, FAILED, NO_EVIDENCE, RETRY_STORM, BUDGET, DRIFT and STALLED runs of Claude Code routines, OpenClaw, n8n and cron jobs, and alerts via Telegram, Slack or webhook. MIT and self-hostable.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables operating a Claude Code session entirely from Telegram around the clock, with two-way voice messages, persistent memory across restarts, scheduled reminders, calendar access, and a self-restarting daemon. It also streams live progress and every tool call as Claude works, supports inline-button prompts and permission approvals, and exposes session/subagent/token visibility through a Telegram Mini App.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first memory for your AI agent. One SQLite file you own — offline, no API key. Plugs straight into Claude Code.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to share persistent local memory across sessions and agents, so rules, mandatory specs, verified code snippets, and past mistakes are automatically surfaced before code is generated. It also lets agents log repeated failures as recurrence-counted 'vaccines', preventing the same errors from recurring across Claude, VS Code agents, and local LLMs.
      7
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to clearly distinct actions (pause, resume, delete, list, get, test, history, report). The main friction is between trigger_update, trigger_tune and trigger_draft, which all modify a trigger; the descriptions do explicitly partition them (tune = quieter only, draft+replace = code/mode changes), so an agent can resolve it, but it takes careful reading. trigger_test also partly overlaps the trial run performed by trigger_draft.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Thirteen of fourteen tools follow a predictable trigger_<verb> pattern in snake_case. The exceptions are trigger_recipes (a noun/listing verb) and service_status, which drops the trigger_ prefix entirely, but both remain readable and unambiguous.

    Tool Count5/5

    Fourteen tools is well within the ideal range and each one covers a distinct lifecycle stage or informational need (draft, activate, pause, resume, tune, test, history, report, recipes, service status). Nothing feels padded or redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The trigger lifecycle is essentially closed: create (draft), activate, pause/resume, update/tune, test, inspect (get/list/history), report a fire, and delete, plus recipes and service health. Minor gaps remain around inspecting raw probe code/execution logs and any bulk or clone operation, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing