Skip to main content
Glama

tauri_ipc_emit_event

Emit Tauri events to test event handlers in Tauri v2 applications. Use this tool to verify IPC communication and event-driven functionality during development and debugging.

Instructions

[Tauri Apps Only] Emit a Tauri event to test event handlers. Requires active tauri_driver_session. Events are Tauri-specific (not DOM events). For browser DOM events, use Chrome DevTools MCP instead.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
eventNameYes
payloadNo
appIdentifierNoApp port or bundle ID to target. Defaults to the only connected app or the default app if multiple are connected.

Implementation Reference

  • Registration of the 'tauri_ipc_emit_event' tool, linking schema and handler function
    {
       name: 'tauri_ipc_emit_event',
       description:
          '[Tauri Apps Only] Emit a Tauri event to test event handlers. ' +
          'Requires active tauri_driver_session. Events are Tauri-specific (not DOM events). ' +
          'For browser DOM events, use Chrome DevTools MCP instead.',
       category: TOOL_CATEGORIES.IPC_PLUGIN,
       schema: EmitTestEventSchema,
       annotations: {
          title: 'Emit Tauri Event',
          readOnlyHint: false,
          destructiveHint: false,
          openWorldHint: false,
       },
       handler: async (args) => {
          const parsed = EmitTestEventSchema.parse(args);
    
          return await emitTestEvent(parsed.eventName, parsed.payload, parsed.appIdentifier);
       },
    },
  • Zod schema for input validation of the tauri_ipc_emit_event tool
    export const EmitTestEventSchema = z.object({
       eventName: z.string(),
       payload: z.unknown(),
       appIdentifier: z.union([ z.string(), z.number() ]).optional().describe(
          'App port or bundle ID to target. Defaults to the only connected app or the default app if multiple are connected.'
       ),
    });
  • Handler function that executes the tool: emits the event via IPC to the Tauri MCP bridge plugin
    export async function emitTestEvent(eventName: string, payload: unknown, appIdentifier?: string | number): Promise<string> {
       try {
          const result = await executeIPCCommand({
             command: 'plugin:mcp-bridge|emit_event',
             args: {
                eventName,
                payload,
             },
             appIdentifier,
          });
    
          const parsed = JSON.parse(result);
    
          if (!parsed.success) {
             throw new Error(parsed.error || 'Unknown error');
          }
    
          return JSON.stringify(parsed.result);
       } catch(error: unknown) {
          const message = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
    
          throw new Error(`Failed to emit event: ${message}`);
       }
    }
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond annotations: it specifies the prerequisite ('requires active tauri_driver_session'), clarifies the event type ('Tauri-specific, not DOM events'), and mentions the testing purpose. While annotations cover basic safety (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false), the description provides operational context that helps the agent understand when and how to use this tool effectively.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is efficiently structured in three sentences: context/prerequisite, core functionality, and explicit alternative. Every sentence adds essential information with zero waste, and it's appropriately front-loaded with the most important constraints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema and moderate parameter coverage, the description provides good contextual completeness. It covers prerequisites, purpose, alternatives, and event type specificity. The main gap is lack of information about return values or what happens after event emission, but given the testing purpose and sibling tool context, this is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 33% schema description coverage (only 'appIdentifier' has a description), the description doesn't provide additional parameter semantics beyond what's in the schema. It mentions 'eventName' and 'payload' but doesn't explain their purpose or format. However, the tool name and context provide some implicit understanding of parameters, meeting the baseline for partial coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('emit a Tauri event') and resource ('test event handlers'), and explicitly distinguishes it from sibling tools by contrasting with 'browser DOM events' and mentioning Chrome DevTools MCP as an alternative. It also specifies the context ('Tauri Apps Only') and prerequisite ('requires active tauri_driver_session').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit guidance on when to use this tool ('Tauri Apps Only', 'to test event handlers', 'requires active tauri_driver_session') and when not to use it ('For browser DOM events, use Chrome DevTools MCP instead'). It clearly differentiates from alternatives and sets context boundaries.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/hypothesi/mcp-server-tauri'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server