Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to anchor-x402-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides AI agents with pay-per-call access to a suite of tools (honeypot check, token market, DeFi yields, etc.) via USDC on Base using the x402 protocol.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing x402 Bazaar's paid Base APIs (token risk/honeypot, prices, gas, wallet intel, tx decode + AI utilities) as agent tools. Your agent pays per call in USDC over x402 — no API keys, no signup.
      17
      246 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for pay-per-call DeFi and crypto data via x402 micropayments on Base. 8 endpoints: token prices, TVL, funding rates, token security, gas tracker, whale monitoring, wallet profiling, and yield scanning.
      8
      25 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that aggregates x402 crypto services as tools for AI agents, providing prices, sentiment, funding rates, and technical indicators with x402 pay-per-call on Base.
      6
      1,535 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing 1,000+ pay-per-call API endpoints across agent infrastructure (memory, coordination, secrets, verification), data, compute, finance, weather, geography, and reference categories — payments via x402 protocol in USDC on Base.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple clusters have fuzzy boundaries: intel_wallet subsumes screen_wallet's sanctions verdict, roast/aura/grade all accept the same universal target inputs, and anchor_hash/attest_decision/oracle all produce dual-chain anchored proofs with only subtle workflow differences. Descriptions carry some disambiguating detail, but an agent could easily misselect between several pairs.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Seven tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (anchor_hash, decode_tx, parse_datetime), but the set also mixes in noun_noun names (token_price, intel_wallet) and five bare single-word names (roast, oracle, tldr, aura, grade). The lack of a uniform convention makes the tool surface feel like two or three different servers bolted together.

    Tool Count4/5

    14 tools is within a reasonable band and none are strictly redundant duplicates. However, the count is slightly inflated by unrelated mini-domains — anchoring infrastructure, wallet/chain data utilities, and LLM entertainment — which dilutes the server's focus.

    Completeness3/5

    For a server whose core promise is cryptographic proof, the anchor-and-prove lifecycle has an obvious gap: there is no verify_anchor or anchor-status tool to check that a previously anchored hash still exists on-chain, forcing agents to work around via decode_tx or explorer URLs. Individual utilities like resolve_name and token_price feel complete, but the wallet screening surface is awkwardly split between screen_wallet and intel_wallet.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow