Skip to main content
Glama
hy-2005
by hy-2005

Related Servers

Alternatives to Browser Pool MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides an antidetect browser with persistent profiles, proxy support, and page control tools (16 tools) for agents, enabling identity-stable browsing sessions across runs.
      486
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for agent-piloted browser automation that clears Cloudflare, providing multi-session parallel Chromes, persistent profiles, stealth features, credential vault, and vision-first clicking.
      86
      46 PyPI
      6
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Meshbrow that gives AI agents full browser automation capabilities with stealth anti-detection, enabling natural language control of browser sessions, data extraction, and multi-browser fleets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing browser automation for AI agents with context-aware playbooks and skills for complex websites.
      18 npm
      177
      PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A dynamic browser pool MCP server that enables multiple concurrent, isolated Playwright sessions for Claude Code and other MCP clients. It manages on-demand instances on dynamic ports to resolve session conflicts and includes automatic cleanup of idle browsers.
      20
      1
      -

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but browser_take_screenshot and browser_screenshot are explicit aliases, causing ambiguity. Additionally, browser_drag and browser_drop could be confused as both relate to drag-and-drop operations.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The majority of tools follow a browser_verb pattern (e.g., browser_navigate, browser_click), but there are exceptions like browser_snapshot, browser_console_messages, and browser_network_requests which use nouns. The pair browser_take_screenshot and browser_screenshot also breaks consistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 25 tools, the server is on the heavy side but still plausible for a comprehensive browser automation tool. However, the presence of a duplicate screenshot tool and a test tool (pool_test) suggests some redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of browser actions: navigation, interaction, screenshots, snapshots, tab management, dialog handling, file upload, and more. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit cookie management or scrolling) but core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues