Skip to main content
Glama
hvkshetry

Wave MCP Server

by hvkshetry

Related Servers

Alternatives to Wave MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A complete MCP server for Wave Accounting, providing comprehensive access to invoicing, customers, products, transactions, bills, estimates, taxes, and financial reporting.
      54
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Comprehensive MCP server for Wave Accounting, providing 45+ tools across invoicing, customers, products, transactions, bills, estimates, taxes, and financial reporting, plus 17 pre-built UI workflows.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for Wave Accounting that lets you query accounts receivable (outstanding invoices with viewing status) and monthly invoiced revenue via natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This project builds a read-only MCP server. For full read, write, update, delete, and action capabilities and a simplified setup, check out our free CData MCP Server for Wave Financial (beta): https://www.cdata.com/download/download.aspx?sku=HWZK-V&type=beta
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables AI assistants like Claude to perform Wave Accounting bookkeeping tasks—such as drafting invoices, managing customers, recording payments, and looking up financial data—through natural language commands.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides complete MCP access to Wave Accounting, enabling AI assistants to manage invoices, payments, customers, and bookkeeping via natural language.
      30
      53 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool focuses on a distinct domain (accounts, items, parties, reference data, reports, transactions), making it easy for an agent to select the right tool based on context. However, the 'reference' tool aggregates many unrelated operations (business info, countries, sales taxes, estimates), which could cause confusion. Overall, ambiguity is low.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names are single-word nouns (account, item, party, etc.), consistent in form. However, operations within tools follow different patterns: most use standard verbs (list, get, create, update, delete), but 'reference' uses descriptive names like 'list_businesses' and 'list_currencies', and 'report' uses compound names like 'business_summary'. This mix reduces overall consistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools covering major Wave entities (accounts, products, customers, transactions, reference data, reports), the count is well-scoped for an accounting MCP server. Each tool earns its place by handling a core domain, and there are no redundant or missing high-level categories.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers essential CRUD operations for accounts, items, customers, and transactions, plus reference lookups and synthesized reports. Notable gaps include limited vendor management (read-only), no dedicated bill/expense tool (though money transactions may cover it), and read-only estimates. The surface is mostly complete for typical accounting workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues