Wave MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Wave MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA complete MCP server for Wave Accounting, providing comprehensive access to invoicing, customers, products, transactions, bills, estimates, taxes, and financial reporting.54-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for Wave Accounting, providing 45+ tools across invoicing, customers, products, transactions, bills, estimates, taxes, and financial reporting, plus 17 pre-built UI workflows.4-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Wave Accounting that lets you query accounts receivable (outstanding invoices with viewing status) and monthly invoiced revenue via natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis project builds a read-only MCP server. For full read, write, update, delete, and action capabilities and a simplified setup, check out our free CData MCP Server for Wave Financial (beta): https://www.cdata.com/download/download.aspx?sku=HWZK-V&type=betaMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server enables AI assistants like Claude to perform Wave Accounting bookkeeping tasks—such as drafting invoices, managing customers, recording payments, and looking up financial data—through natural language commands.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides complete MCP access to Wave Accounting, enabling AI assistants to manage invoices, payments, customers, and bookkeeping via natural language.3053 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool focuses on a distinct domain (accounts, items, parties, reference data, reports, transactions), making it easy for an agent to select the right tool based on context. However, the 'reference' tool aggregates many unrelated operations (business info, countries, sales taxes, estimates), which could cause confusion. Overall, ambiguity is low.
Tool names are single-word nouns (account, item, party, etc.), consistent in form. However, operations within tools follow different patterns: most use standard verbs (list, get, create, update, delete), but 'reference' uses descriptive names like 'list_businesses' and 'list_currencies', and 'report' uses compound names like 'business_summary'. This mix reduces overall consistency.
With 6 tools covering major Wave entities (accounts, products, customers, transactions, reference data, reports), the count is well-scoped for an accounting MCP server. Each tool earns its place by handling a core domain, and there are no redundant or missing high-level categories.
The tool set covers essential CRUD operations for accounts, items, customers, and transactions, plus reference lookups and synthesized reports. Notable gaps include limited vendor management (read-only), no dedicated bill/expense tool (though money transactions may cover it), and read-only estimates. The surface is mostly complete for typical accounting workflows.