Skip to main content
Glama
Image Unblur image preflight MCP

Image Unblur image preflight MCP

by Content-true

Image Unblur image preflight MCP

A small local helper for preparing photos before using Image Unblur. The official website performs AI enhancement; this server does not upload, process, or reconstruct image pixels.

The check_image_metadata tool checks a file's format, byte size, and dimensions against the site's published limits: JPG/PNG/WebP, 20 MB, 24 megapixels, and 64–16,384 pixels per side. plan_enhancement suggests a cautious Basic or Pro first pass from a blur description, with reminders to verify faces and text. get_official_links returns the official site, pricing, and contact pages.

For example, before trying to unblur image online, check that a 1200×800 PNG is within the upload limits, then compare any result at full size. The site says Pro can redraw details; a sharper face or letter is not necessarily a more accurate one. Do not use enhancement to claim recovery of intentionally obscured information.

Run

Node.js 20.18.1 or newer:

npm install
npm test
node index.mjs

Configure an MCP client to start node /absolute/path/to/imageunblur-mcp/index.mjs over stdio. No API key or image upload is involved. Limits may change; check the official site before sending a file. MIT license; see LICENSE.

Available Tools

3 tools
check_image_metadataCheck image upload limitsA

Check only file format, byte size, and dimensions against published Image Unblur limits. No image file is sent.

Inputs: width (required), format (required), height (required), sizeBytes (required).

plan_enhancementPlan an enhancementC

Choose a cautious first model from blur symptoms. It does not inspect or modify an image.

Inputs: blurType (required), severity (required), containsTextOrFaces (required).

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three tools target clearly separate preflight stages: returning official resources, checking metadata limits, and planning a model choice. None overlap in action or output, so an agent can easily select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names use consistent snake_case with a verb_noun structure: get_official_links, check_image_metadata, plan_enhancement. The convention is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools fit the narrow preflight scope, but the surface is very small and one tool is essentially a static link lookup. It is appropriately scoped rather than excessive, though slightly minimal.

    Completeness4/5

    For a preflight-only server, the core checks are covered: resource links, metadata validation, and enhancement planning. There is no actual enhancement execution, which is consistent with the stated scope, but agents may need external follow-through via the official links.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers