Skip to main content
Glama
Content-true

Image Unblur image preflight MCP

by Content-true
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Image Unblur image preflight MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • blur-studio

      fauzulkc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for coordinate-based selective photo blurring, letting AI agents blur faces, plates, or regions with ellipses, rectangles, and VIP exclusion boxes. Exposes tools to scan folders, manage configs, apply blur, and export Python snippets.
      MIT
    • mcp-review by apatureai

      mcp-reviewofficial

      apatureai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for in-loop design review of web previews. It enables agents to submit a preview URL, receive structured findings with suggested fixes, and recheck after applying changes, while never editing code itself.
      5
      2
      MIT

    • shutter-mcp

      keivanmalhani
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local, read-only MCP server that lets AI agents inspect and analyze photo libraries by scanning files, aggregating EXIF stats, finding duplicates, scoring blur, and generating cull reports without uploading any data.
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three tools target clearly separate preflight stages: returning official resources, checking metadata limits, and planning a model choice. None overlap in action or output, so an agent can easily select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names use consistent snake_case with a verb_noun structure: get_official_links, check_image_metadata, plan_enhancement. The convention is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools fit the narrow preflight scope, but the surface is very small and one tool is essentially a static link lookup. It is appropriately scoped rather than excessive, though slightly minimal.

    Completeness4/5

    For a preflight-only server, the core checks are covered: resource links, metadata validation, and enhancement planning. There is no actual enhancement execution, which is consistent with the stated scope, but agents may need external follow-through via the official links.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources