Skip to main content
Glama

fulfill_shopify_order

Creates an Odoo sale order and Asana fulfillment task from a Shopify order, returning a combined summary to replace manual cross-tool copying.

Instructions

The ops-hub flow: pull a Shopify order, create the matching Odoo sale order, open an Asana fulfillment task, and return a combined summary. This is the one-call replacement for manually copying an order across three tools.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dueOnNo
asanaProjectIdYes
shopifyOrderIdYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the main steps (pull, create, open, return) and implies mutations, but does not mention failure modes, partial execution behavior, or authentication prerequisites across the three systems.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no waste, front-loading the core flow. Lacks structured breakdown but remains efficient and readable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a multi-step orchestrator with no output schema and no annotations, the description omits parameter semantics, return format, and error handling. An agent cannot reliably invoke it without guessing parameter meanings and expected output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description gives no meaning for shopifyOrderId, asanaProjectId, or dueOn. Since it is a composite tool, it is critical to know which ID belongs to which system; the description fails to compensate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific composite operation: pulls a Shopify order, creates an Odoo sale order, opens an Asana fulfillment task, and returns a combined summary. Clearly distinguishes from individual sibling tools by describing a multi-step flow.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly positions this as the one-call replacement for three tools, implying it should be used when the full flow is needed. However, it does not state when to prefer individual tools or any exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.