hugomemo-qa
Related Servers
Alternatives to hugomemo-qa
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceDeterministic Android game QA automation MCP server providing device control, perception (OCR, template matching, YOLO), scripted task execution, and findings reporting for AI agents.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables QA workflows by running test cases, searching a local bug database, generating deterministic test data, and providing test-plan templates over MCP.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables bounded, deterministic triage verdicts for server health, fleet status, and timeline investigation through a simulated execution-boundary MCP server.35MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides a central gateway to 170+ offline mock MCP servers with deterministic fixture-based responses and per-server SQLite state, enabling realistic credential-free agent trajectory testing and multi-step workflow rehearsal.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceThis MCP server provides a stateful, resettable, verifiable API runtime that gates every tool call, enabling agents to run long workflows against provider-shaped environments without live provider write access. It records decisions, side effects, and outcome evidence for replayable, verifiable benchmark runs.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides structured MCP tools for local runtime observability and debugging of React Native/Expo apps on Android, enabling evidence-first diagnostics such as screenshots, UI trees, per-request network capture, performance metrics, and CDP-based console/heap/profiling exports.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with the qa_get_* family splitting out entitlement, usage, session, round, attempts, ratings, and sync status. A few could cause mild confusion—get_app_snapshot overlaps with individual getters, and get_attempts vs get_round_detail both touch attempt data—but the descriptions provide enough separation.
All tools share a consistent qa_ prefix and use snake_case verb_object naming: qa_get_* for reads, qa_set_*/qa_reset_*/qa_seed_*/qa_force_* for fixture mutations, and qa_validate_* for contract checks. The pattern is uniform and predictable.
Eighteen tools is on the heavier side for a typical MCP server, but the count is justified by the QA instrumentation scope: many read-only truth endpoints plus a distinct fixture control-plane group. There is no obvious filler or redundancy that would make the set feel bloated.
The surface covers health, entitlement/usage, session/round/attempt data, skill/memory ratings, sync status, contract validation, and test-user fixtures. Minor gaps exist—such as no explicit create-test-user tool or read-back for seeded questions—but the core QA and test-fixture workflows are well supported.