Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to browser-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      MCP server that captures a website's full design and content, producing a downloadable Next.js clone package with tokens, components, and a rebuild guide.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for browser automation that drives Chrome via an extension, preserving login state and offering 45 tools for navigation, interaction, scraping, and screenshots.
      53
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that measures how faithfully one UI reproduces another, returning a score and actionable findings for improvement.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that uses headless Chromium (Puppeteer) to capture pixel-perfect screenshots and extract DOM from URLs, with LLM-friendly step-based workflows.
      2
      13 npm
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is minor overlap between get_element_by_selector and get_element_styles (both return style info) and between download_assets and get_fonts (both list fonts). Overall, the boundaries are clear enough for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., analyze_layout, download_assets, get_element_styles). Even single-word tools like 'navigate' and 'screenshot' fit the imperative style. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the server is well-scoped for browser inspection and debugging tasks. Each tool covers a clear aspect (navigation, HTML, CSS, layout, assets, scripts, screenshots) without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover static analysis well but lack interactive capabilities such as clicking, form filling, cookie management, or network request interception. This may leave agents unable to perform dynamic browser automation tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues