Google Search MCP Server
The Google Search MCP Server enables AI assistants to perform web and image searches using Google's Custom Search API. It offers:
Web Search: Perform queries for general content, news, and articles with site filtering
Image Search: Find images related to specific terms with returned URLs, titles, and thumbnails
Pagination: Navigate through search results using the
startparameterCustomization: Filter web searches by specific sites and control result count
Integration: Connects with MCP-compatible clients like Claude for Desktop, Cursor, or VSCode with Claude
Enables web searches using Google's Custom Search API, allowing retrieval of current information from the internet.
Utilizes Google Cloud Platform's Custom Search API to perform web and image searches, returning structured results with metadata.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Google Search MCP Serverfind recent news about AI advancements"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Google Search MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides web and image search capabilities through Google's Custom Search API. This server follows the MCP specification to integrate with Claude and other AI assistants.
What We're Building
Many AI assistants don't have up-to-date information or the ability to search the web. This MCP server solves that problem by providing two tools:
google_web_search: Search the web for current informationgoogle_image_search: Find images related to queries
Once connected to an MCP-compatible client (like Claude in Cursor, VSCode, or Claude Desktop), your AI assistant can perform searches and access current information.
Related MCP server: Google Search MCP Server
Core MCP Concepts
MCP servers provide capabilities to AI assistants. This server implements:
Tools: Functions that can be called by the AI (with user approval)
Structured Communication: Standardized messaging format via the MCP protocol
Transport Layer: Communication via standard input/output
Prerequisites
Node.js (v18 or higher) and npm
Google Cloud Platform account
Google Custom Search API key and Search Engine ID
An MCP-compatible client (Claude for Desktop, Cursor, VSCode with Claude, etc.)
Quick Start (Clone this Repository)
If you want to use this server without building it from scratch, follow these steps:
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/google-search-mcp-server.git
cd google-search-mcp-server
# Install dependencies
npm install
# Set up your environment variables
# Setup .env file in the root folder of the project
# On macOS/Linux
touch .env
# On Windows
new-item .env
# Edit .env file to add your Google API credentials
# Use any text editor you prefer (VS Code, Notepad, nano, vim, etc.)
# Add these to your newly created .env
GOOGLE_API_KEY=your_api_key_here
GOOGLE_CSE_ID=your_search_engine_id_here
# Build the server
npm run build
# Test the server (optional)
# On macOS/Linux
echo '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"listTools","id":1}' | node dist/index.js
# On Windows PowerShell
echo '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"listTools","id":1}' | node dist/index.js
# On Windows CMD
echo {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"listTools","id":1} | node dist/index.jsAfter building, follow the Connecting to MCP Clients section to connect the server to your preferred client.
Set Up Your Environment (Build from Scratch)
If you prefer to build the server yourself from scratch, follow these instructions:
Create Project Structure
macOS/Linux
# Create a new directory for our project
mkdir google-search-mcp
cd google-search-mcp
# Initialize a new npm project
npm init -y
# Install dependencies
npm install @modelcontextprotocol/sdk dotenv zod
npm install -D @types/node typescript
# Create our files
mkdir src
touch src/index.tsWindows
# Create a new directory for our project
md google-search-mcp
cd google-search-mcp
# Initialize a new npm project
npm init -y
# Install dependencies
npm install @modelcontextprotocol/sdk dotenv zod
npm install -D @types/node typescript
# Create our files
md src
new-item src\index.tsConfigure TypeScript
Create a tsconfig.json in the root directory:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "ES2022",
"module": "Node16",
"moduleResolution": "Node16",
"outDir": "./dist",
"rootDir": "./src",
"strict": true,
"esModuleInterop": true,
"skipLibCheck": true,
"forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true
},
"include": ["src/**/*"],
"exclude": ["node_modules"]
}Update package.json
Ensure your package.json includes:
{
"name": "google_search_mcp",
"version": "0.1.0",
"description": "MCP server for Google Custom Search API integration",
"license": "MIT",
"type": "module",
"bin": {
"google_search": "./dist/index.js"
},
"files": [
"dist"
],
"scripts": {
"build": "tsc",
"build:unix": "tsc && chmod 755 dist/index.js",
"prepare": "npm run build",
"watch": "tsc --watch",
"start": "node dist/index.js"
}
}Google API Setup
You'll need to set up Google Cloud Platform and get API credentials:
Google Cloud Platform Setup
Go to Google Cloud Console
Create a new project
Enable the Custom Search API:
Navigate to "APIs & Services" → "Library" Search for "Custom Search API" Click on "Custom Search API" → "Enable"Create API credentials:
Navigate to "APIs & Services" → "Credentials" Click "Create Credentials" → "API key" Copy your API key
Custom Search Engine Setup
Click "Add" to create a new search engine
Select "Search the entire web" and name your search engine
Get your Search Engine ID (cx value) from the Control Panel
Environment Configuration
Create a .env file in the root directory:
GOOGLE_API_KEY=your_api_key_here
GOOGLE_CSE_ID=your_search_engine_id_hereAdd .env to your .gitignore file to protect your credentials:
echo ".env" >> .gitignoreBuilding Your Server
Create the Server Implementation
Create your server implementation in src/index.ts:
import dotenv from "dotenv"
import { Server } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/index.js";
import { StdioServerTransport } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/stdio.js";
import {
CallToolRequestSchema,
ListToolsRequestSchema,
Tool,
} from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/types.js";
dotenv.config();
// Define your tools
const WEB_SEARCH_TOOL: Tool = {
name: "google_web_search",
description: "Performs a web search using Google's Custom Search API...",
inputSchema: {
// Schema details here
},
};
const IMAGE_SEARCH_TOOL: Tool = {
name: "google_image_search",
description: "Searches for images using Google's Custom Search API...",
inputSchema: {
// Schema details here
}
};
// Server implementation
const server = new Server(
{
name: "google-search",
version: "0.1.0",
},
{
capabilities: {
tools: {},
},
},
);
// Check for API key and Search Engine ID
const GOOGLE_API_KEY = process.env.GOOGLE_API_KEY!;
const GOOGLE_CSE_ID = process.env.GOOGLE_CSE_ID!;
if (!GOOGLE_API_KEY || !GOOGLE_CSE_ID) {
console.error("Error: Missing environment variables");
process.exit(1);
}
// Tool handlers
server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async () => ({
tools: [WEB_SEARCH_TOOL, IMAGE_SEARCH_TOOL],
}));
server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
// Implement tool handlers
});
// Run the server
async function runServer() {
const transport = new StdioServerTransport();
await server.connect(transport);
console.error("Google Search MCP Server running on stdio");
}
runServer().catch((error) => {
console.error("Fatal error running server:", error);
process.exit(1);
});For the complete implementation details, see the repository files.
Building the Server
After completing your implementation, build the server:
npm run buildThis will compile the TypeScript code to JavaScript in the dist directory.
Connecting to MCP Clients
MCP servers can be connected to various clients. Here are setup instructions for popular ones:
Claude for Desktop
macOS/Linux
Open your configuration file:
code ~/Library/Application\ Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonAdd the server configuration:
{
"mcpServers": {
"google_search": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"/absolute/path/to/google-search-mcp/dist/index.js"
],
"env": {
"GOOGLE_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here",
"GOOGLE_CSE_ID": "your_search_engine_id_here"
}
}
}
}Windows
Open your configuration file:
code $env:AppData\Claude\claude_desktop_config.jsonAdd the server configuration:
{
"mcpServers": {
"google_search": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"C:\\absolute\\path\\to\\google-search-mcp\\dist\\index.js"
],
"env": {
"GOOGLE_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here",
"GOOGLE_CSE_ID": "your_search_engine_id_here"
}
}
}
}Restart Claude for Desktop
Verify the tools appear by clicking the tool icon in the interface
VSCode with Claude
macOS/Linux & Windows
Install the MCP Extension for VSCode
Create or edit
.vscode/settings.jsonin your workspace:
For macOS/Linux:
{
"mcp.servers": {
"google_search": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"/absolute/path/to/google-search-mcp/dist/index.js"
],
"env": {
"GOOGLE_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here",
"GOOGLE_CSE_ID": "your_search_engine_id_here"
}
}
}
}For Windows:
{
"mcp.servers": {
"google_search": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"C:\\absolute\\path\\to\\google-search-mcp\\dist\\index.js"
],
"env": {
"GOOGLE_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here",
"GOOGLE_CSE_ID": "your_search_engine_id_here"
}
}
}
}Restart VSCode
The tools will be available to Claude in VSCode
Cursor
Open Cursor settings (gear icon)
Search for "MCP" and open MCP settings
Click "Add new MCP server"
Configure with similar settings to above:
For macOS/Linux:
{
"mcpServers": {
"google_search": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"/absolute/path/to/google-search-mcp/dist/index.js"
],
"env": {
"GOOGLE_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here",
"GOOGLE_CSE_ID": "your_search_engine_id_here"
}
}
}
}For Windows:
{
"mcpServers": {
"google_search": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"C:\\absolute\\path\\to\\google-search-mcp\\dist\\index.js"
],
"env": {
"GOOGLE_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here",
"GOOGLE_CSE_ID": "your_search_engine_id_here"
}
}
}
}Restart Cursor
Testing Your Server
Using with Claude
Once connected, you can test the tools by asking Claude questions like:
"Search for the latest news about renewable energy"
"Find images of electric vehicles"
"What are the top tourist destinations in Japan?"
Claude will automatically use the appropriate search tool when needed.
Manual Testing
You can also test your server directly:
# Test web search
echo '{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "callTool",
"params": {
"name": "google_web_search",
"arguments": {
"query": "test query",
"count": 2
}
},
"id": 1
}' | node dist/index.jsWhat's Happening Under the Hood
When you ask a question:
The client sends your question to Claude
Claude analyzes the available tools and decides which to use
The client executes the chosen tool through your MCP server
The results are sent back to Claude
Claude formulates a natural language response based on the search results
The response is displayed to you
Troubleshooting
Common Issues
Environment Variables
If you see Error: GOOGLE_API_KEY environment variable is required:
# Check your .env file
cat .env
# Try setting environment variables directly:
export GOOGLE_API_KEY=your_key_here
export GOOGLE_CSE_ID=your_id_hereAPI Errors
If you encounter API errors:
# Test your API credentials directly
curl "https://www.googleapis.com/customsearch/v1?key=YOUR_API_KEY&cx=YOUR_CX_ID&q=test"Connection Issues
If your client can't connect to the server:
# Verify the server runs correctly on its own
node dist/index.js
# Check file permissions
chmod 755 dist/index.js
# Ensure you're using absolute paths in your configurationAPI Reference
google_web_search
Performs a web search using Google's Custom Search API.
Parameters:
query(string, required): The search querycount(number, optional): Number of results (1-10, default 5)start(number, optional): Pagination start index (default 1)site(string, optional): Limit search to specific site (e.g., 'example.com')
google_image_search
Searches for images using Google's Custom Search API.
Parameters:
query(string, required): The image search querycount(number, optional): Number of results (1-10, default 5)start(number, optional): Pagination start index (default 1)
Limitations
Free tier of Google Custom Search API: 100 queries per day
Server-enforced rate limit: 5 requests per second
Maximum 10 results per query (Google API limitation)
License
This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.
Available Tools
2 toolsgoogle_image_searchB
Searches for images using Google's Custom Search API. Best for finding images related to specific terms, concepts, or objects. Returns image URLs, titles, and thumbnails. Use this when needing to find relevant images or visual references.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | No | Number of results (1-10, default 5) | |
| query | Yes | Image search query | |
| start | No | Pagination start index (default 1) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the API source and return values (image URLs, titles, thumbnails) but lacks details on rate limits, authentication needs, error handling, or whether this is a read-only operation. For a search tool with external API dependencies, this leaves significant behavioral gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is appropriately sized and front-loaded: it starts with the core purpose, adds context about best use cases, specifies return values, and ends with usage guidance. Every sentence adds value without redundancy, making it efficient and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's moderate complexity (external API search with 3 parameters) and no annotations or output schema, the description is partially complete. It covers purpose, usage, and returns but lacks behavioral details like rate limits or error handling. It's adequate for basic use but insufficient for robust agent operation without additional context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all three parameters (count, query, start) with their types, defaults, and constraints. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what's in the schema, meeting the baseline for high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Searches for images using Google's Custom Search API' with specific resources (image URLs, titles, thumbnails) and distinguishes it from the sibling google_web_search by focusing on images rather than general web content. However, it doesn't explicitly name the sibling for comparison.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides implied usage guidance: 'Best for finding images related to specific terms, concepts, or objects' and 'Use this when needing to find relevant images or visual references.' It suggests when to use it but doesn't explicitly mention when not to use it or directly compare it to the sibling google_web_search.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
google_web_searchA
Performs a web search using the Google Custom Search API, ideal for general queries, news, articles, and online content. Use this for broad information gathering, recent events, or when you need diverse web sources. Supports pagination and filtering by site or type. Maximum 10 results per request, with start index for pagination.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | No | Number of results (1-10, default 5) | |
| query | Yes | Search query | |
| site | No | Optional: Limit search to specific site (e.g., 'site:example.com') | |
| start | No | Pagination start index (default 1) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions key behavioral traits: 'maximum 10 results per request', 'supports pagination and filtering by site or type', and 'start index for pagination'. However, it doesn't cover important aspects like rate limits, authentication requirements, error conditions, or what the response format looks like.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is efficiently structured in three sentences that each serve distinct purposes: stating the core functionality, providing usage guidance, and disclosing behavioral constraints. Every sentence earns its place with no redundant information, making it appropriately sized and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a search tool with 4 parameters, 100% schema coverage, but no annotations and no output schema, the description provides adequate context about what the tool does and when to use it. However, it lacks information about the response format, error handling, and operational constraints like rate limits, which would be important for an API-based search tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 100% schema description coverage, the input schema already documents all 4 parameters thoroughly. The description adds minimal value beyond what's in the schema - it mentions 'filtering by site or type' and 'pagination' which map to the 'site' and 'start' parameters, but doesn't provide additional semantic context beyond what the schema descriptions already offer.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool 'performs a web search using the Google Custom Search API' with specific examples of use cases (general queries, news, articles, online content). It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'google_image_search' by specifying this is for web content rather than images. However, it doesn't explicitly contrast with the sibling beyond the domain difference.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use this tool ('broad information gathering, recent events, or when you need diverse web sources'), which implicitly distinguishes it from the image search sibling. It doesn't explicitly state when NOT to use it or name alternatives beyond the implied contrast with image search.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: google_image_search is for finding images, while google_web_search is for general web content like articles and news. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool based on the need for visual vs. textual information.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'google_' prefix and descriptive suffixes (_image_search, _web_search). The naming is uniform and predictable, adhering to snake_case throughout without any deviations or mixed conventions.
With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but reasonable for a search-focused domain, covering image and web searches. It might feel slightly thin if broader search capabilities (e.g., video, news-specific) were expected, but it's well-scoped for basic search needs without being overloaded.
For a Google Search server, the tools cover the core search operations: image and web searches. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of specialized search types (e.g., video, scholarly articles) or advanced filtering options, but agents can work around this with the provided tools for most common queries.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Google search results via SERP API
Live AI-native web search with citations. One tool for every MCP client. Flat per-request pricing.
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
The Remote MCP server acts as a standardized bridge between LLM applications (like Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor) and external services, enabling AI agents to access external tools and resources. Its primary capability is providing a centralized search tool to discover other MCP servers and their respective tools. Unlike local implementations, it runs remotely with OAuth authentication and permission controls for security.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to perform web searches using Google's Custom Search API through a standardized interface.147MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude to perform Google Custom Search operations by connecting to Google's search API.2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude to perform web research by integrating Google search, extracting webpage content, and capturing screenshots.131,56720MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude to perform web research by integrating Google search, extracting webpage content, and capturing screenshots in real-time.41,5679MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/hunter-arton/google_search_mcp_server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server