Skip to main content
Glama
humyai99

mcp-syncnology

by humyai99
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-syncnology

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-server-synology

      Mrquj
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a Synology NAS through the official DSM WebAPI, covering File Station, Download Station, Synology Photos, Container Manager, and system management with curated tools and a generic bridge for other APIs.
      -

    • Synology NAS MCP

      miku2339
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables self-hosted access to Synology NAS files, system monitoring, container management, and download tasks through MCP clients, with optional connectivity to ChatGPT via a secure tunnel.
      3
      1
      MIT

    • synology-office-mcp

      vocweb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server that exposes Synology Drive, Spreadsheet, MailPlus, and Calendar as structured tools for AI agents, enabling file, spreadsheet, email, and calendar management via natural language.
      39
      17 npm
      11
      MIT

    • Synology_MCP

      DerHary
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Synology NAS services including DSM, File Station, Calendar, Note Station, Contacts, Chat, Download Station, and Container Manager through a modular MCP interface with configurable safety modes.
      MIT

    • mcp-synology

      cmeans
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Synology NAS — modular, secure (2FA-ready), permission-tiered. File management and beyond.
      298 PyPI
      8
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinctly different resource or action: file browsing vs system monitoring vs backup status vs download tasks vs camera listing vs logs. No two tools appear to overlap in purpose, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'syncnology_' prefix and follow an action_noun pattern (list, get, create, delete). Minor deviations exist such as 'backup_task_status' and 'system_logs' instead of 'get_backup_task_status' and 'get_system_logs', but overall the naming is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is well within the ideal range for a server covering multiple NAS subdomains. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is neither too sparse nor overwhelming.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers core NAS operations—file listing/info/create/delete, system stats, backup task queries, and download management. However, gaps exist: no file upload/download content transfer, no backup task creation/modification, and camera support is limited to listing. These are notable but not fatal for many workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources