Skip to main content
Glama
humyai99

mcp-syncnology

by humyai99

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-syncnology

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a Synology NAS through the official DSM WebAPI, covering File Station, Download Station, Synology Photos, Container Manager, and system management with curated tools and a generic bridge for other APIs.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server that exposes Synology Drive, Spreadsheet, MailPlus, and Calendar as structured tools for AI agents, enabling file, spreadsheet, email, and calendar management via natural language.
      39
      8 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Synology NAS services including DSM, File Station, Calendar, Note Station, Contacts, Chat, Download Station, and Container Manager through a modular MCP interface with configurable safety modes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Synology NAS — modular, secure (2FA-ready), permission-tiered. File management and beyond.
      84 PyPI
      7
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to inspect Synology NAS system, storage, and utilization, and manage Docker containers via the Synology Web API with automatic session handling.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinctly different resource or action: file browsing vs system monitoring vs backup status vs download tasks vs camera listing vs logs. No two tools appear to overlap in purpose, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'syncnology_' prefix and follow an action_noun pattern (list, get, create, delete). Minor deviations exist such as 'backup_task_status' and 'system_logs' instead of 'get_backup_task_status' and 'get_system_logs', but overall the naming is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is well within the ideal range for a server covering multiple NAS subdomains. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is neither too sparse nor overwhelming.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers core NAS operations—file listing/info/create/delete, system stats, backup task queries, and download management. However, gaps exist: no file upload/download content transfer, no backup task creation/modification, and camera support is limited to listing. These are notable but not fatal for many workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues