Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Capture Win MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to automate macOS through AppleScript and JXA by providing 44 tools for application management, window control, and UI interaction. It allows for comprehensive system control including screen capture, keyboard and mouse simulation, and system information retrieval.
      44
      27 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to automate macOS desktop tasks including mouse control, keyboard input, screenshots, window management, and UI interaction.
      7 npm
      415
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to capture and analyze screenshots of macOS applications, windows, or the entire screen using local (Ollama) or cloud-based AI vision models, with non-intrusive, fast screen capture via Apple's ScreenCaptureKit.
      3
      5 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control macOS desktop apps via screenshots, mouse clicks, keyboard input, accessibility queries, and AppleScript.
      11
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to automate Hyprland desktop environments through screenshots, mouse/keyboard input, window management, workspaces, clipboard, app launching, and OCR.
      27
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: list_windows enumerates available windows with organizational details, while capture_window takes a specific window ID to capture an image. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions clearly differentiate their roles, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (list_windows, capture_window), using snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and aligns well with their actions, providing clear and uniform identification.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but appropriately scoped for its purpose of window listing and screenshot capture. It feels slightly thin, as additional related operations (e.g., capturing the entire screen or managing windows) could enhance coverage, but the core workflow is supported without bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    For the domain of window management and screenshot capture, the tools cover the essential workflow: listing windows to obtain IDs and capturing specific windows. A minor gap exists, such as the inability to capture the entire screen or multiple windows at once, but agents can effectively use the provided tools without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues