playwright-report-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to playwright-report-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that unpacks and structures Playwright trace.zip archives so AI agents can perform root-cause analysis on CI failures, with 16 focused tools for inspection, DOM/UI analysis, root-cause analysis, and performance analysis.1955 npm1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to autonomously test, debug, and analyze web interfaces visually using Playwright, with 30 tools for screenshots, workflows, performance, and visual comparison.3046 npm83ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides structured control of a Playwright browser for QA, scraping, diagnostics, and reproducible browser workflows.9,525 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that automates Playwright-based UI and API testing, supporting test case generation from requirements or API specs, and execution with detailed reports.12 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA Playwright-based MCP server that exposes a live browser as a traceable, inspectable, debuggable and controllable execution environment for AI agents.5,484 npm57-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude direct control of a real browser via Playwright, enabling AI-driven web testing, autonomous test execution, and live failure analysis through natural language.89,525 npm3-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clear, non-overlapping purpose: running tests, listing tests, retrieving failures, checking run status, and reading attachments. No two tools could be easily confused.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (run_tests, list_tests, get_failed_tests, get_run_status, get_test_attachment). The verbs are clear and the pattern is uniform across the set.
With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of managing Playwright test runs and reports. Each tool covers a distinct aspect without unnecessary bloat or thinness.
The tool surface covers the core tasks: running, listing, inspecting failures, checking status, and reading attachments. A minor gap is the lack of a way to retrieve all test results (not just failures), but the current set handles the primary workflow effectively.