Enable or disable comments

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Reveals credential reading behavior from .tempmd file, which is helpful. However, lacks details on idempotency, error states, or impact on existing comments.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the main action, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description omits return value, error scenarios, and does not fully explain all parameters. Lacks completeness for a mutation tool without output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description indirectly addresses project_dir and update_token by mentioning credential reading from .tempmd when omitted. However, temp_id is not described in schema or description, and schema coverage is only 50%. Description adds moderate value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Toggle' and resource 'pinned visitor comments (Pindrop) on a Temp's page'. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like update_temp which might also modify a Temp. But the focus on comments is distinct enough.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit usage guidelines. The description does not indicate when to use this tool over sibling tools, nor does it mention prerequisites or scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.