Skip to main content
Glama
huajibing

CHGIS MCP Server

by huajibing

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
search_place_by_idB

Query historical place details by unique ID

search_placesC

Search places by name, year, administrative level, etc.

get_place_historical_contextB

Get historical context and hierarchical relationships of a place

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_place_historical_context retrieves context and relationships, search_place_by_id queries by ID, and search_places searches by multiple criteria. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: get_place_historical_context, search_place_by_id, and search_places. The naming is predictable and uniform throughout the set.

Tool Count3/5

With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a historical geographic information system domain. While the tools cover core querying functions, the scope suggests potential gaps in operations like data creation, updates, or more specialized analyses.

Completeness2/5

The toolset is severely incomplete for a CHGIS server, lacking any CRUD operations beyond querying. There are no tools for creating, updating, or deleting place data, and no lifecycle coverage, which will likely cause agent failures in broader workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues