Skip to main content
Glama
htunaa

cook4fun-mcp

by htunaa

Launch a coin

cook4fun_launch

Deploy a new coin, open its Uniswap V4 pool, and optionally make a first buy. Requires ETH.

Instructions

Launch a new coin on cook4.fun: deploys the token, opens its Uniswap V4 pool, and optionally makes a first buy. Requires a wallet with ETH.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesCoin name, e.g. "Space Cat"
imageNoAny public image URL (https or ipfs://). cook4.fun copies it onto IPFS and pins it, so a temporary host is fine — you don't need to host it permanently yourself.
symbolYesTicker, e.g. SCAT
twitterNo
websiteNo
telegramNo
distributeNoShare LP fees with holders
descriptionNo
firstBuyEthNoETH amount for an initial buy, e.g. "0.05"
metadataUrlNoERC-7572 metadata JSON URL
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses main actions (deploy, open pool, optional buy) and a prerequisite. No annotations present, so description carries full burden; lacks details on costs, reversibility, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single compact sentence that conveys essential information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 10 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is minimal. Lacks explanation of return values, post-launch behavior, or parameter interactions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameter details in description; schema covers 60% of parameters with descriptions. Description adds no value beyond schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool launches a new coin, detailing actions (deploys token, opens Uniswap V4 pool, optional first buy). It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like cook4fun_buy, cook4fun_sell, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions prerequisite ('requires a wallet with ETH'), providing context. No explicit when-not or alternatives, but sibling names imply usage for creation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/htunaa/cook4fun-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server