F
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceMCP server that enables Claude Code to delegate tasks to DeepSeek and other LLMs, offering 20 tools for code review, analysis, testing, and code generation.
20
1
-
Astron MCP
by htmambo
Related Servers
Alternatives to Astron MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for running external coding agents as background tasks inside Claude Code. Supports multiple backends including Codex, Grok, GLM, DeepSeek, and more.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that bridges CLI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, opencode, and Antigravity into any MCP client, enabling synchronous and asynchronous task execution, follow-up input, and a structured code review tool.103 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables Claude Code to send code and plans for review by OpenAI Codex, returning structured feedback inline.5140 npm27MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA universal AI assistant MCP server that transforms Claude into a multi-talented development assistant with intelligent mode selection, conversation continuity, and smart file handling. Automatically adapts to different tasks like debugging, code analysis, planning, and testing while supporting multiple AI providers and maintaining context across conversations.11-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides agentic code review powered by OpenAI-compatible models, designed for use with Claude Code.1MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation2/5
The 'chat' tool can also perform code and plan review, directly overlapping with the dedicated 'review_code' and 'review_plan' tools, making it unclear when to use which.
Naming Consistency2/5
Three tools follow a verb_noun pattern ('get_token_stats', 'review_code', 'review_plan'), but 'chat' is a single verb without a noun, breaking consistency.
Tool Count4/5
With 4 tools, the set is small but not minimal; it covers the apparent domain (review, chat, stats) without being too sparse or bloated.
Completeness3/5
The set covers code review, plan review, general chat, and token stats, but lacks tools for session management or other common operations, leaving some gaps.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues