GPSS Patent Search MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to GPSS Patent Search MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables searching Korean patents, trademarks, and designs via KIPRIS Plus open APIs. Supports keyword, advanced, applicant, and rightholder searches with detailed bibliographic lookup.750 npm54MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for patent search and prior art discovery powered by Google Patents public dataset on BigQuery. Supports searching patents, fetching full patent details with CPC codes and citations, and retrieving legal claims text.36MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMulti-source patent search MCP server that allows AI agents to search global patent databases (Google Patents, BigQuery, EPO OPS) via natural language queries.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for consulting Brazilian patents (INPI) from official sources. It provides a read-only tool to search patent information via natural language, with pre-paid credit usage.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for USPTO patent prior-art search, enabling keyword search, ranking, and date filtering via Claude, Cursor, or Windsurf.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for patent research and enterprise architecture pattern extraction.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools serve clearly distinct purposes: searching patents, listing available databases, and retrieving search examples. There is no meaningful overlap in intent, so an agent can select the correct tool without confusion.
All three names follow the same (verbatim auto-generated) pattern of 'tool_x_tools_x_post', so the convention is technically consistent. However, the redundant, verbose, and double-encoded structure is awkward and hard to read, making names less predictable than a clean verb_noun scheme.
Three tools—one core search plus two metadata helpers—is slightly thin but well-scoped for a focused patent search server. Nothing extraneous is present.
The core search, database listing, and example retrieval are covered, but there is no tool to fetch full details for a specific patent number and no apparent support for citation, family, or document retrieval. These are notable gaps for a patent-search domain.