Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-polib

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that integrates with Phrase Strings to manage translation projects, keys, and translations. Enables AI assistants to perform CRUD operations on projects, locales, and translations programmatically.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides line-oriented text file editing capabilities through a standardized API. Optimized for LLM tools with efficient partial file access to minimize token usage.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A ModelContextProtocol server providing high-quality translation services with a three-stage translation workflow (analysis, segmented translation, full-text review) that supports multiple languages and integrates with Claude and OpenAI-compatible models.
      26
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables Large Language Models to interact with Git repositories through a robust API, supporting operations like repository initialization, cloning, file staging, committing, and branch management.
      28
      2,852 npm
      240
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides secure and intelligent interaction with files and filesystems, offering smart context management and token-efficient operations for working with large files and complex directory structures.
      21
      67
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct, clearly described purpose: read all entries, write entries, read a specific entry with context, and list fuzzy entries. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause an agent to select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    read_po and write_po follow a consistent verb_noun pattern, but read_po_context adds a qualifier and find_fuzzy drops the resource noun entirely. The names are readable but the convention is not uniformly applied.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for a focused PO file utility. Each tool covers a meaningful operation and none feel redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core read/write workflow plus useful context and fuzzy-entry queries for PO file management. It lacks an explicit delete operation, but this is a minor gap that can often be worked around via update operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues