Skip to main content
Glama
hplin

tastytrade-research-mcp

by hplin

Related Servers

Alternatives to tastytrade-research-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables point-in-time backtesting on daily bars with declarative strategy specs and deterministic simulated runs, offering two tool surfaces without needing API keys or network access.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run WorldQuant BRAIN alpha backtests via MCP, supporting expression submission, status tracking, result analysis, and batch resumption.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interactive access to TradeSearcher strategies and backtests via CLI and MCP, allowing agents to search, backtest, and compare trading strategies.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the Nubra trading platform for authentication, instrument lookup, quotes, historical data, options analytics, portfolio management, report generation, screening, backtesting, and order placement via UAT environment.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      exposes a remote MCP endpoint so agents can: run strategy backtests by symbol/timeframe/date range, pass strategy inputs programmatically, receive structured backtest results (trades, win rate, profit, drawdown), keep long-running runs observable via progress notifications, support Binance Futures tickers only, enforce a maximum of 1440 candles per backtest, apply a rate limit of 3 backtests per
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables backtesting of limit-order strategies on Polymarket's BTC 5-minute markets using historical data, with tools to browse markets, get price series, and run simulations.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct by resource and action, but the backtest/simulation cluster (create_backtest, simulate_trade, simulate_spx_spread, create_spx_spread_backtest) risks confusion despite clarifying descriptions. The price/prepare/simulate spread pipeline is well-separated with explicit roles.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent tastytrade_ prefix with snake_case verb_noun naming (list_backtests, create_backtest, get_backtest_logs, cancel_backtest). Verbs and objects are uniform and predictable across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a research-focused server. Each tool contributes to distinct workflows such as backtest management, option pricing, spread simulation, and historical data access without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The core research workflow is well covered: backtest lifecycle (list, create, get, cancel, logs), historical simulation, option pricing, spread normalization, and candle retrieval. Minor gaps exist such as lack of a delete-backtest or batch operation, but no critical dead ends are apparent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive