Skip to main content
Glama
hoyt-harness

ProcExecMCP

by hoyt-harness
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ProcExecMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • NotiCode

      Antropov31
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Runs as an MCP server providing file system operations, shell execution, and system information tools, allowing Claude or any MCP client to edit files and control the machine.
      2
      7
      MIT

    • Shell-MCP

      kevinwatt
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server for executing whitelisted shell commands with resource and timeout controls, designed for integration with Claude and other MCP-compatible LLMs.
      20
      389 npm
      7
      MIT

    • Claude MCP Command Server

      kimjungyeol
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server implementation for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) that allows Claude AI to execute commands through a command-line interface, enabling direct system interactions from within Claude.
      -

    • Desktop Commander MCP

      MrGNSS
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server that lets Claude desktop app execute terminal commands on your computer and edit files through Model Context Protocol, featuring command execution, process management, and advanced file operations.
      19
      158,647 npm
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: executing commands, searching file contents, listing processes, and killing processes. There is no functional overlap, and descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: execute_command, search_file_contents, list_processes, kill_process. The naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 4 tools, the set is well-scoped for its purpose of process and command management plus file content searching. Each tool earns its place with comprehensive parameters and security considerations.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the core operations for its domain: command execution, file content search, process enumeration, and process termination. There are no obvious gaps for the intended functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources