Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pi-delegate-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables a primary agent in Antigravity IDE to delegate coding tasks to background subagents across multiple model backends, with crash recovery, process cleanup, and human-in-the-loop approval for destructive actions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Hermes agents to delegate bounded coding tasks to persistent oh-my-pi sessions with isolated git worktrees, live steering, and durable follow-ups, requiring explicit user confirmation before each task.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to delegate tasks to external coding agents (Codex or Antigravity) for independent reviews, separate quota usage, and async processing.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to delegate coding tasks to Pi CLI as a programmable sub-agent with session tracking and process management.
      7
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase of the delegate lifecycle: starting (spawn, run, spawn_batch), monitoring (status, sessions), interacting (steer, answer, follow_up), and cleanup (abort, forget). Descriptions clearly differentiate async vs sync and running vs finished states, so misselection is unlikely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools use imperative single-word verbs (spawn, steer, abort) or compound verbs (spawn_batch, follow_up), but two are bare nouns (sessions, models) instead of list-style verbs like list_sessions. This is a minor deviation from an otherwise predictable, straightforward naming scheme.

    Tool Count5/5

    At 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose—managing delegated pi agents. Each tool covers a necessary operation without redundancy, and the count falls comfortably within the 3–15 ideal range for a focused MCP server.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides full lifecycle coverage: launch, monitor, interact, redirect, follow-up, abort, clean up, and list. It also includes init and models for setup and model selection. There are no obvious gaps that would cause agent dead-ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues