Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pi-delegate-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables a primary agent in Antigravity IDE to delegate coding tasks to background subagents across multiple model backends, with crash recovery, process cleanup, and human-in-the-loop approval for destructive actions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an orchestrator like Claude Code to hand coding work off to Cursor SDK agents, run as detached background jobs that survive the session and can be listed, inspected, steered, resumed, or stopped. Agents are asynchronous and reusable across follow-up turns, letting expensive frontier models delegate cheaply without blocking or paying to read the results.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Hermes agents to delegate bounded coding tasks to persistent oh-my-pi sessions with isolated git worktrees, live steering, and durable follow-ups, requiring explicit user confirmation before each task.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to delegate tasks to external coding agents (Codex or Antigravity) for independent reviews, separate quota usage, and async processing.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to delegate coding tasks to Pi CLI as a programmable sub-agent with session tracking and process management.
      7
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase of the delegate lifecycle: starting (spawn, run, spawn_batch), monitoring (status, sessions), interacting (steer, answer, follow_up), and cleanup (abort, forget). Descriptions clearly differentiate async vs sync and running vs finished states, so misselection is unlikely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools use imperative single-word verbs (spawn, steer, abort) or compound verbs (spawn_batch, follow_up), but two are bare nouns (sessions, models) instead of list-style verbs like list_sessions. This is a minor deviation from an otherwise predictable, straightforward naming scheme.

    Tool Count5/5

    At 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose—managing delegated pi agents. Each tool covers a necessary operation without redundancy, and the count falls comfortably within the 3–15 ideal range for a focused MCP server.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides full lifecycle coverage: launch, monitor, interact, redirect, follow-up, abort, clean up, and list. It also includes init and models for setup and model selection. There are no obvious gaps that would cause agent dead-ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues