Skip to main content
Glama
howdoiusekeyboard

TrueVoice MCP

by howdoiusekeyboard
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to TrueVoice MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Natural Voice MCP

      Protogenus
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides tools and resources to detect AI-generated writing patterns and refine text for more authentic, human-like communication. It enables users to analyze phrasing via a scoring system and apply conversational guides tailored for platforms like Twitter and LinkedIn.
      1
      -

    • mcp-humanizer

      nicojan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides psycholinguistic, lexical, structural, and discourse-level rules to help writing sound human-authored. Includes reference readers and a compliance checker.
      MIT

    • Natural Voice MCP

      emSoumik
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides writing guidance and mechanical lint checks to help AI clients draft or rewrite content in a specific natural voice.
      MIT

    • HumanizerMCP

      zhaohongyuziranerran
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Detects and removes 24 types of AI writing patterns, offering dual-mode humanization (rule-based and LLM-enhaced) with tools for detection, style transfer, scoring, and batch processing.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: retrieving rules, analyzing text for slop, and providing examples. There is no meaningful overlap between them, and their descriptions clearly separate the reference/instructional functions from the analysis function.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a clear and predictable lowercase snake_case pattern, mostly using get_ for reference tools and check_for_ for the analysis tool. Minor inconsistency exists between get_ and check_for_ as verb styles, but the naming remains readable and consistent overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is a well-scoped count for a focused MCP server centered on human writing rules and AI slop detection. Each tool serves a distinct and necessary role without bloat or redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core domain well: users can learn the rules, see examples, and check their text for slop. A minor gap is the absence of a rewrite/improvement tool, but this is not a significant failure for the apparent advisory/analysis purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources