Skip to main content
Glama
howdoiusekeyboard

TrueVoice MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to TrueVoice MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to analyze text or files and receive numeric slop scores, band labels, specific violations with context, and concrete writing advice, using rule-based diagnostics with no LLM judge or API calls.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to lint prose for formulaic AI writing patterns through the check_slop and check_slop_file tools, returning a 0–100 score, band label, specific violations with context, and concrete revision advice. Scoring is purely rule-based with no LLM judge or API calls, and custom rule configurations can be supplied.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to score text from 0–100 for formulaic AI writing patterns using rule-based heuristics, returning violations, bands, and advice via the check_slop and check_slop_file tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides tools and resources to detect AI-generated writing patterns and refine text for more authentic, human-like communication. It enables users to analyze phrasing via a scoring system and apply conversational guides tailored for platforms like Twitter and LinkedIn.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to analyze inline prose or files on disk for formulaic AI writing patterns, returning a 0-100 score, band label, specific violations with context, and concrete advice. Uses purely programmatic, configurable rules with no LLM judge or API calls.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: retrieving rules, analyzing text for slop, and providing examples. There is no meaningful overlap between them, and their descriptions clearly separate the reference/instructional functions from the analysis function.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a clear and predictable lowercase snake_case pattern, mostly using get_ for reference tools and check_for_ for the analysis tool. Minor inconsistency exists between get_ and check_for_ as verb styles, but the naming remains readable and consistent overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is a well-scoped count for a focused MCP server centered on human writing rules and AI slop detection. Each tool serves a distinct and necessary role without bloat or redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core domain well: users can learn the rules, see examples, and check their text for slop. A minor gap is the absence of a rewrite/improvement tool, but this is not a significant failure for the apparent advisory/analysis purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues