A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceMCP server for content-studio, enabling AI agents to manage content ideas, channels, personas, and drafts with approval-based edits.
5 npm
AGPL 3.0
@houtini/contentmarketingideas
Officialby houtini-ai
Related Servers
Alternatives to @houtini/contentmarketingideas
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server to manage WordPress sites via natural language, enabling content creation, SEO, and multi-site administration through AI tools like Claude Desktop.701,291 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Claude.ai to a Notion-based marketing knowledge base, enabling search and retrieval across specialized domains like enterprise platforms and competitive positioning. It provides tools for RAG-style Q\&A and content browsing to assist with drafting RFPs and value propositions.1-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA high-performance MCP server designed for content creators. It automates the workflow of scraping web articles and transforming them into viral social media posts using specialized, context-aware prompt templates.22MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for AI content generation, enabling agents to learn a voice, generate content ideas, write scripts, and produce multi-platform content deterministically.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that repurposes text or URL content into platform-optimized posts for Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, and newsletters using AI. It enables users to automatically transform articles and blog posts into engagement-ready social media threads and professional captions.-
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 59 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools target distinct resources (sites, sources, briefs, articles, GSC data, corpus), so an agent can usually tell them apart. However, some overlap exists: generate_article, generate_draft, and create_article all involve content creation, and the many gsc_* tools are similar in nature. Descriptions help, but a few pairs are ambiguous.
Naming Consistency3/5
The majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_*, get_*, create_*, update_*, delete_*, trigger_*). However, the gsc_* family uses noun_noun/adjective prefixes (gsc_summary, gsc_queries), and brief_feedback breaks the verb-first pattern. This mixed convention makes the API less predictable.
Tool Count2/5
59 tools is a very large surface for a single MCP server. While the broad scope of content marketing automation justifies some heft, the sheer number will overwhelm agents and increase selection errors. It would benefit from splitting into focused servers or consolidating related tools.
Completeness4/5
The toolset covers the full content lifecycle: sources, briefs, drafts, articles, publishing, plus GSC analytics, RAG corpus, coverage, and growth plans. Core workflows are well-supported with no showstopper gaps. Minor omissions like no update_profile or list_drafts are workarounds rather than dead ends.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues