env_remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but only states the action 'delete environment' without disclosing behavioral traits. It doesn't mention whether this is destructive, irreversible, requires permissions, has side effects, or what happens to associated resources. For a deletion tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with just two characters ('删除环境'), which is appropriately sized for its minimal content. It's front-loaded with the core action, though this brevity comes at the cost of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a deletion tool with 2 parameters, 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'environment' means in this context, how deletion differs from termination/purge, what the parameters do, or what to expect upon execution. Given the complexity and lack of structured data, it should provide more context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate but provides no parameter information. It doesn't explain what 'ids' represents (environment identifiers) or what 'clearEnvFolder' does (likely a flag to clear associated folders). With 2 undocumented parameters, the description adds no value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '删除环境' (delete environment) states a clear verb+resource action, but it's vague about what 'environment' refers to and doesn't distinguish from siblings like env_terminate, env_purge_cache, or group_remove. It provides basic purpose but lacks specificity about scope or differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like env_terminate, env_purge_cache, or group_remove. The description doesn't mention prerequisites, exclusions, or appropriate contexts, leaving the agent with no usage direction beyond the basic action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.