Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Loopy MCP Server

Loopy MCP Server

by hotkid61
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

get_loop_recommendations

Receive loop recommendations based on your task description, guiding you to the appropriate agent workflow.

Instructions

Get loop recommendations based on what you're trying to accomplish

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "task": "<task>"
    },
    "name": "get_loop_recommendations"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
taskYesDescribe what you want to accomplish

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.8/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether the operation is read-only, or what the output format is. It fails to compensate for the absence of annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence and concise, but it lacks detail. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity but could be more informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the single parameter and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what constitutes a recommendation or how to use the results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a description for the 'task' parameter, but the tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'Describe what you want to accomplish'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides loop recommendations based on a task. It differentiates from siblings like get_loop_details or search_loops by focusing on recommendations, but the phrasing 'based on what you're trying to accomplish' is somewhat vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like search_loops or discover_patterns. The description does not specify prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools