hostkey-mcp-server-ru
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to hostkey-mcp-server-ru
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables management of Timeweb Cloud resources including servers, databases, Kubernetes clusters, S3 storage, DNS, SSH keys, and floating IPs through natural language.976 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables deploying applications and managing cloud resources in Timeweb Cloud through natural language.1008 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables users to manage Hetzner Cloud resources including servers, load balancers, and volumes through natural language commands. It facilitates infrastructure operations such as resource creation, security configuration, and real-time pricing queries within AI-powered environments.85 npm1-

hostman-mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables deploying applications to Hostman, creating VPCs, databases, and floating IPs, and managing VCS providers through natural language prompts.128 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI clients to manage Webdock.io VPS infrastructure through natural language, including provisioning servers, handling snapshots, managing SSH/shell users and scripts, configuring webhooks, and inspecting account or billing details.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables management of LunaNode VPS resources including VMs, images, volumes, floating IPs, SSH keys through natural language with tiered safety controls.12MIT
TDQS
Scored across 132 tools
Most tools have distinct verb_noun names and clear descriptions, but with 132 tools there are several closely related pairs (e.g., get_servers vs get_server, s3_get_buckets vs s3_get_buckets_via_queue, create_reinstall_task vs reinstall_server) that could cause misselection. The catch-all call_api_raw also overlaps with many typed tools, increasing ambiguity.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, create_, delete_, etc.) with domain prefixes like s3_, request_rh_, and pdns_. While there are minor deviations (e.g., port_on vs set_main_ip, or occasional camelCase like add_iso_image), the overall schema is predictable and readable.
132 tools is an extreme count, far exceeding the 50+ threshold considered appropriate. Even for a comprehensive cloud provider API, this volume overwhelms an agent's tool-selection capability and significantly increases the chance of misselection. The server would benefit from consolidation or hierarchical grouping.
The tool surface covers CRUD and lifecycle operations across multiple domains: servers, network, DNS, S3, billing, and remote hands. Obvious gaps are rare (e.g., no direct server rename or tag edit tool, but these are edge cases). The presence of a raw API call tool also fills potential holes, so agents can accomplish most tasks.