get_bookmarks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full behavioral burden and does not meet it. "List" weakly implies a read-only call, but there is nothing about pagination, ordering, whether unauthenticated calls fail, or whether the category filter is exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with the purpose front-loaded and zero filler. The second sentence is terse to the point of being cryptic, but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and 0% parameter coverage, the description would need to carry much more. It omits accepted category values, result shape, and pagination, leaving an agent unable to call this confidently beyond the default case.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate and it only partially does. "Category RES is restaurants" gives meaning to the default value, but never states what other category values are accepted or what happens on an unknown value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb+resource ("List the signed-in user's bookmarks") with an explicit scope of the authenticated user. It does not distinguish itself from siblings like bookmark_status or list_my_guides, so an agent cannot tell from the description alone which listing tool applies when.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no alternative named. The sibling set contains several closely related listing tools (bookmark_status, list_my_guides, get_my_guide_items) that the description never addresses.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.